no, you['re wrong. That is exactly what is being discussed, as you
have defined it below.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Dick Martin <ofpgmr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Exactly true, but that is not what is being discussed, is it. You have
erected a straw man, then beaten it down.
Would you care to address the actual topic instead of your straw man??
On 2/11/2012 4:31 PM, rick baird wrote:
banding together for the good of the community is not the same thing
as having things taken from you and given to others based on someone
else's idea of fair.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Dick Martin<ofpgmr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
aec, help me out here. What is the problem with the community banding
together and doing things as a group to make everyone's life better?
Whatever that may be, from driving away varmits to teaching children to
having a witch doctor to making sure everyone has a pot, and a chicken
to put in it.
Why do you believe this is not a reasonable and proper role for the
community, instead of this savaging of all those who are less than
perfect that you seem to prefer?
It really does sound to me like you are advocating Ayn Rand's desire for
an establishment of a monarchy based on trial by battle.
On 2/11/2012 8:35 AM, aec wrote:
It's a cheap copout.
The bill gave unconstitutional sweeping legislative powers to the HHS
and other administrative operatives, including the power to pick and
choose who gets a "Get out of jail free" card based on whatever excuse
they decide to come up with. And decide who gets jail threats (no waiver
for you buddy).
The bill said they could make up any rule they want, decide what each
and every policy had to cover by force of law, and what no policy could
cover.
This is such an abomination, an acceleration toward dictatorship.
Private companies have been threatened.
They're acting like this new "compromise" from the White House is a
retreat by this heavy handed dictatorial administration. It's not. They
just gave the bishops an out, while they still require that insurance
companies provide this coverage, and anybody with two molecules left in
their brain has to agree that whoever the provider is, they're going to
include the contraceptives (including the abortifacients also covered)
in the pricing.
On 2/7/12 5:17 PM, Paul Nelson wrote:
"We have to pass it in order to know what's in it".
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/dem-rep-kathy-dahlkemper-i-wouldnt-have-
voted-obamacare-if-id-known-about-hhs-regulation_626302.html
http://tinyurl.com/7ana3up
Paul Nelson
Office 512-392-2577
Cell 708-670-6978
nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the Open discussion among iSeries Users (CPF0000) mailing list
To post a message email: CPF0000@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cpf0000
or email: CPF0000-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/cpf0000.
--
This is the Open discussion among iSeries Users (CPF0000) mailing list
To post a message email: CPF0000@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cpf0000
or email: CPF0000-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/cpf0000.
