< banding together for the good of the community is not the same thing as
having things taken from you and given to others based on someone else's
idea of fair. >
Except in Booth's world of the extreme left where the state owns everything
and you can only have a share, the size of which is determined by a
committee.
Norm Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From: cpf0000-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpf0000-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of rick baird
Sent: Sunday, 12 February 2012 6:32 AM
To: Open discussion among iSeries Users
Subject: Re: [CPF0000] A democrat grows a pair
banding together for the good of the community is not the same thing as
having things taken from you and given to others based on someone else's
idea of fair.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Dick Martin <ofpgmr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
aec, help me out here. What is the problem with the community banding
together and doing things as a group to make everyone's life better?
Whatever that may be, from driving away varmits to teaching children
to having a witch doctor to making sure everyone has a pot, and a
chicken to put in it.
Why do you believe this is not a reasonable and proper role for the
community, instead of this savaging of all those who are less than
perfect that you seem to prefer?
It really does sound to me like you are advocating Ayn Rand's desire
for an establishment of a monarchy based on trial by battle.
On 2/11/2012 8:35 AM, aec wrote:
It's a cheap copout.
The bill gave unconstitutional sweeping legislative powers to the HHS
and other administrative operatives, including the power to pick and
choose who gets a "Get out of jail free" card based on whatever
excuse they decide to come up with. And decide who gets jail threats
(no waiver for you buddy).
The bill said they could make up any rule they want, decide what each
and every policy had to cover by force of law, and what no policy
could cover.
This is such an abomination, an acceleration toward dictatorship.
Private companies have been threatened.
They're acting like this new "compromise" from the White House is a
retreat by this heavy handed dictatorial administration. It's not.
They just gave the bishops an out, while they still require that
insurance companies provide this coverage, and anybody with two
molecules left in their brain has to agree that whoever the provider
is, they're going to include the contraceptives (including the
abortifacients also covered) in the pricing.
On 2/7/12 5:17 PM, Paul Nelson wrote:
"We have to pass it in order to know what's in it".
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/dem-rep-kathy-dahlkemper-i-would
nt-have-
voted-obamacare-if-id-known-about-hhs-regulation_626302.html
http://tinyurl.com/7ana3up
Paul Nelson
Office 512-392-2577
Cell 708-670-6978
nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the Open discussion among iSeries Users (CPF0000) mailing list
To post a message email: CPF0000@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cpf0000
or email: CPF0000-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/cpf0000.
--
This is the Open discussion among iSeries Users (CPF0000) mailing list To
post a message email: CPF0000@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or
change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cpf0000
or email: CPF0000-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/cpf0000.
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2112/4803 - Release Date: 02/11/12
