Rich,
Exactly, you could show he used and had access to his gun, but you don't
question him about every single instance he was at the driving range.
-Mike
On Nov 30, 2007 11:48 AM, Rich Rijnders <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Your example actually WOULD be relevant in a murder case. I don't agree
with
it, but it is used to establish means (he has access to guns) and ability
(he knows how to use them).
On 11/30/07 10:20 AM, "Michael" <michael2938@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's like saying a man killed someone because he has a pattern of
behavior
of shooting guns.
--
This is the Open discussion among iSeries Users (CPF0000) mailing list
To post a message email: CPF0000@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cpf0000
or email: CPF0000-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/cpf0000.
