Mike,
Really, do you want to compare some (if not most) if the drivel that
comes from Booth's fingers to what Paul, Rick, and I post?
Really?
Gerald Magnuson
-----Original Message-----
From: cpf0000-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpf0000-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Michael
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 12:08 PM
To: Open discussion among iSeries Users
Subject: Re: [CPF0000] Liberal philosophy
Please re-read my post that you are quoting as my response.
Specifically
the part about "the point" and apply it to the past year or two. Forget
about Iraq for the moment. I don't know how I can make it any more
clear.
Like I said yesterday, I don't really care, so I am going to drop it.
If
you can't see the hypocrisy of Paul accusing me of never disagreeing
with
Booth, then there is nothing more I can say.
-Mike
On Nov 27, 2007 12:58 PM, rick baird <rick.baird@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
He only recently changed his mind about Iraq, and this is the first
I've heard of it.
On 11/27/07, Michael <michael2938@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
That's irrelevant. The point is you three never debate anything and
for
the
second day in a row I get accused of something like "You're going to
let
<insert Booth or Terry, or whoever> get away with <whatever they
said>.
-Mike
