Please re-read my post that you are quoting as my response. Specifically
the part about "the point" and apply it to the past year or two. Forget
about Iraq for the moment. I don't know how I can make it any more clear.
Like I said yesterday, I don't really care, so I am going to drop it. If
you can't see the hypocrisy of Paul accusing me of never disagreeing with
Booth, then there is nothing more I can say.
-Mike
On Nov 27, 2007 12:58 PM, rick baird <rick.baird@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
He only recently changed his mind about Iraq, and this is the first
I've heard of it.
On 11/27/07, Michael <michael2938@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
That's irrelevant. The point is you three never debate anything and for
the
second day in a row I get accused of something like "You're going to let
<insert Booth or Terry, or whoever> get away with <whatever they said>.
-Mike
