You're too funny for a Monday.
Paul Nelson
Cell 708-670-6978
Office 512-392-2577
nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: cpf0000-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpf0000-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Booth Martin
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 3:43 PM
To: Open discussion among iSeries Users
Subject: Re: [CPF0000] Vindication
Paul, I have made a few errors on here, but not lots and lots. I
usually acknowledge them right away. Generally, however, you and others
pronounce me wrong but offer no supporting evidence nor any reasonable
support for your statements.
In other words, I am usually right with what I say; you just don;t
happen to like the truth.
This is a typical example. You use a story that involves reaching moral
and/or subjective conclusions with gut feelings, and use that to support
the idea that you can reach factual, historical, and scientific
conclusions without regard to the facts, but just by using your gut
feelings. Its just plain weird.
Paul Nelson wrote:
28 posts have that phrase. 29 now.
On every one of them, you were proven to be wrong. On this one, you are
simply out of your element. You'd better pass on this discussion.
Next.
Paul Nelson
Cell 708-670-6978
Office 512-392-2577
nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: cpf0000-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpf0000-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On
Behalf Of Booth Martin
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 3:06 PM
To: Open discussion among iSeries Users
Subject: Re: [CPF0000] Vindication
"Does it pass the smell test?" I believe you will find that phrase in
the archives in my posts. I believe in this, exactly, but I don't
accept it as a basis for historical fact or scientific conclusion.
Paul Nelson wrote:
Booth laughs about gut feelings, but here's justification for them:
http://www.newsweek.com/id/71514/page/1
Paul Nelson
Cell 708-670-6978
Office 512-392-2577
nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
