While she may have had good academic credentials, and was a loyal footqualified?
soldier for the GOP, she was apparently lacking in management experience
(I"m being very polite here) and common sense. She was appointed
because she was a staunch conservative above all else.
I can find no reference anywhere to show who appointed her as Assistant
US attorney. Just because it was during the Clinton years does not mean
that the administration had anything to do with her appointment. The US
Attorneys can appoint their own assistants, as can other designated
Booth Martin wrote:
Did you actually read the story? Even her Senator sponsor has abandoned
Rich Rijnders wrote:
What credentials, indeed? What evidence do you have that she was NOT
----- Original Message ----
From: Booth Martin <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Open discssion among iSeries Users <cpf0000@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 9:50:55 AM
Subject: [CPF0000] Ooops... another inexperienced person appointed...?
"... Paulose, at 34 the nation's youngest chief federal prosecutor,
part of a wave of Bush administration insiders dispatched to run U.S.
attorney's offices around the country, ..."
This goes beyond incompetence and reaches towards downright lunacy.
What credentials could she possibly have had for that appointment?
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2014 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact