Ah.... the Devil is in the details! :) Haven't you just asked the
whole question? Isn't this the sticking point?
Paul Nelson wrote:
Define responsible
Paul Nelson
Cell 708-670-6978
Office 708-425-4198
nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: cpf0000-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpf0000-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Booth Martin
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 1:31 PM
To: Open discussion among iSeries Users
Subject: Re: [CPF0000] Another Gun Nut Runs Amok
Well, isn't that all any of us talking about then? Where we would draw
the line? I say gun ownership and use should be limited to responsible
people. What are your limits?
rick baird wrote:
first of all, as much as I like Ted, I think you can put him at the
extreme end of the spectrum, don't you think?
And I bet even Ted doesn't advocate for idiots and kids with guns.
In fact, I'm pretty sure he would advise you against it.
On 4/25/07, Booth Martin <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am being absurd? Isn't it Ted Nugent's view that guns should be
everywhere, from schools to churches to cars to airports and airplanes?
Has he suggested any limitation of any kind? Is there an age limit? A
skills test requirement? A minimal eyesight requirement? Any
limitation at all?
rick baird wrote:
...
I know you are only being absurd to try and make a point
...
--
---------------------------------
Booth Martin
http://www.Martinvt.com
---------------------------------
--
This is the Open discussion among iSeries Users (CPF0000) mailing list
To post a message email: CPF0000@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cpf0000
or email: CPF0000-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/cpf0000.
