The interstate commerce clause has been used to subvert more
constitutional rights more often than any other thing.
maybe it's the commerce clause that needs to be clarified?
;-)
On 4/24/07, Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> All these states and counties and cities have
> managed to pass gun legislation based on
> some Constitutional criteria,
Answering my own question, here is the quote from USC 18, Part I,
chapter 44, section 922, paragraph (q)(1)(I)
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000922----000-.html
'(I) the Congress has the power, under the interstate commerce clause
and other provisions of the Constitution, to enact measures to ensure
the integrity and safety of the Nation's schools by enactment of this
subsection.'
It's the battle between regulating commerce and the right to bear arms.
--
This is the Open discussion among iSeries Users (CPF0000) mailing list
To post a message email: CPF0000@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cpf0000
or email: CPF0000-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/cpf0000.
