So... you want to do what? Strike first?
fbocch2595@xxxxxxx wrote:
I'm with you right up until the last line. It'll be too late then.
-----Original Message-----
From: kc2hiz@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpf0000@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: [CPF0000] Iran Exonerates Six Who Killed in Isla m’s Name
So Buck, the gameplan is;
We talk/negotiate with them to make sure they
don't have the intense hatred of Israel and the
west while they don't have the bomb.
Then, when they have nuke capability...we'll
continue to talk right up until the time they
point the nuke at Israel?
I'm pretty sure that's not what I said.
Here, diplomacy means explaining to Iran, teaching Iran, making them
believe with all their heart that will will kill them very, very, very
dead if they even think about using a nuke on Israel. If they use a
nuke on Israel, we'll go into Arabia and the SeaBees will bulldoze
Mecca and Medina and build a full scale replica of Berkeley and San
Francisco, and relocate the Jewish survivors to New Berkeley and New
San Francisco where they will be paid a hundred dollars a day each to
use Mohammad's grave as a Jewish latrine. Carthago delenda est.
Right next to that message is the alternative of living in peace with
the Jews. And everybody else. We explain the benefits of
civilisation and compare and contrast with the detrimental effects of
their entire race being very dead.
The diplomatic part of all this is to say it in a way that they will
understand. In a way that they KNOW we mean it. In a way that they
KNOW we will bring them into the company of nations as long as they
are good. We need to convince them that the rewards of civilisation
outweigh the 'rewards' of taking out some of the Jews.
And if they use the bomb, we follow through.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.5.5/769 - Release Date: 4/19/2007 5:56 PM
