If neither side is required to conceed any points of the negotiation
to the other, then what is the purpose of talking?
Do you have any evidence that Iran is in the least interested in
giving up any one of the 'must haves' on our side?
Or, is the act of training and arming the men who kill our soldiers
something you are willing to overlook in this negotiation?
On 4/19/07, Booth Martin <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No. That is not the point of negotiation Rick. It is a process by which
the involved parties or group resolve matters of dispute by holding
discussions and coming to an agreement which can be mutually agreed by
them. There is no requirement that either side scratch any backs,
rick baird wrote:
> isn't that the point of negotiation? we scratch their backs, they
> scratch our backs, everyone gets something?
>
> or would you rather we bomb them?
>
> On 4/19/07, Booth Martin <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Why would we give them anything, Rick?
>>
>>
--
---------------------------------
Booth Martin
http://www.Martinvt.com
---------------------------------
--
This is the Open discussion among iSeries Users (CPF0000) mailing list
To post a message email: CPF0000@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cpf0000
or email: CPF0000-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/cpf0000.
