would this charter have anything to do with why they're currently in
court fighting (using public funds) the public release of their own
study (using public funds) as to whether their news coverage is indeed
biased?
On 4/11/07, Dave Kahn <dkahn400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/04/07, qsrvbas@xxxxxxxxxxxx <qsrvbas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Much agreed that it would make compelling TV. However, I can't
> determine whether the screenplay for the project was "too positive"
> or not without a hint of how the screenplay portrayed it all.
>
> If the Beharry project was turning out to be a fantasy story as
> opposed to a solid reenactment of events, perhaps the BBC should be
> commended. OTOH, if the BBC merely acted out of its own political
> agenda, condemnation should be loud and clear.
The BBC is not permitted to have a political agenda. See
<http://www.bbc.co.uk/info/policies/charter/> which explains the
beeb's policies and standards and has links to the Royal Charter and
accompanying Agreement that enable it to exist.
--
Dave...
--
This is the Open discussion among iSeries Users (CPF0000) mailing list
To post a message email: CPF0000@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cpf0000
or email: CPF0000-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/cpf0000.
