That is a detail oriented being.
Probably make a good programmer.
Although the documentation could use some work.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Booth Martin" <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Open discussion among iSeries Users" <cpf0000@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [CPF0000] The fossils- (was (no subject) (catching up..)
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:38:24 -0500
But Albert! Thats the beauty of the proof! The ID Being was so
thorough in the detail S/He even provided fossils! That is incredibly
complex; no mere mortal would have thought to add fossils now, would they?
Albert York wrote:
I know that creationists have an explanation. However, ID propoenents are constantly saying that ID is a valid scientific theory and is not creationism, although design without implementation (creation) is worthless so who implemented the design? If ID is a valid scientific theory it should have a scientific explanation for fossils. I am still waiting for that explanantion. The best that Alan can seem to to is take pot shots at evolution's explanation.--
This is the Open discussion among iSeries Users (CPF0000) mailing list
To post a message email: CPF0000@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
or email: CPF0000-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2013 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact