Albert, somewhat off topic, but I attended a wedding at the Unitarian
Church not too long ago and was pleasantly surprised when the pastor
concluded the ceremony with this: May God, if He or She exists, bless
this union.
My kind of church.
Albert York wrote:
That is a detail oriented being.
Probably make a good programmer.
Although the documentation could use some work.
Albert
----- Original Message -----
From: "Booth Martin" <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Open discussion among iSeries Users" <cpf0000@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [CPF0000] The fossils- (was (no subject) (catching up..)
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:38:24 -0500
But Albert! Thats the beauty of the proof! The ID Being was so
thorough in the detail S/He even provided fossils! That is incredibly
complex; no mere mortal would have thought to add fossils now, would they?
Albert York wrote:
I know that creationists have an explanation. However, ID
propoenents are constantly saying that ID is a valid scientific
theory and is not creationism, although design without
implementation (creation) is worthless so who implemented the
design? If ID is a valid scientific theory it should have a
scientific explanation for fossils. I am still waiting for that
explanantion. The best that Alan can seem to to is take pot shots
at evolution's explanation.
Albert
--
---------------------------------
Booth Martin
http://www.Martinvt.com
---------------------------------
--
This is the Open discussion among iSeries Users (CPF0000) mailing list
To post a message email: CPF0000@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cpf0000
or email: CPF0000-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/cpf0000.
