No, Rick. It does make me wonder though... If you understood the idea
of peace, negotiations, etc. perhaps then you could be more accepting
of solutions besides bombing the snot out of them?
rick baird wrote:
Booth would apologize, and ask them why they don't like us and how we
could change that.
;-)
On 3/16/07, Dave Kahn <dkahn400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 15/03/07, Booth Martin <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am curious if you have any thoughts on what America should do if North
Korea were to miraculously fire a nuclear weapon of any significant size
towards Seattle
You would do two things. You'd try to shoot the missile down, and
you'd launch a retaliatory strike. You'd have to. That's how the
theory of MAD works. The enemy doesn't attack you because they are
100% certain you will hit back. If the enemy thinks there's the
smallest possibility you are bluffing the whole thing falls down.
The downside is that you must have decided in advance that if they do
attack you, you will hit back. That's how you make sure they don't
attack you. It's a mathematical decision (game theory), not a moral
one.
--
Dave...
--
This is the Open discussion among iSeries Users (CPF0000) mailing list
To post a message email: CPF0000@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cpf0000
or email: CPF0000-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/cpf0000.
