There is no difference. We look after our interests, the other
countries in the world look after their own interests.
By elevating the UN to some sort of utopic ideal is foolish. and
Bolton wants what most Americans want. to defend America's interests.
Shouldn't that the duty of every ambassador to the UN? or is it
their duty to ask France and Angola what we should do?
On 11/24/06, Booth Martin <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Right, Rick. What is different than that in America, or in Indiana?
Thats the way people do it. In fact its the reason America works. Your
view is that all that is important is what John Bolton wants?
rick baird wrote:
> "the whole World", as represented at the UN is not out to save "the
> Whole world".
>
> they're out to benefit themselves. and 2nd and 3rd world countries
> (most countries) couldn't give a crying crap about global warming,
> but are more than eager to accept anything that will get them money.
>
> "the whole World" is just looking after themselves.
>
> On 11/22/06, Booth Martin <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be nice if we could accept the idea that the whole World
>> should have some say in the whole World's future?
>>
>> Unfortunately, all over the World there are a lot of people that
>> sincerely believe that all that really matters is what they can see
>> from their front porch. Their idea of widening their horizon is to
>> stand on a chair.
>>
--
---------------------------------
Booth Martin
http://www.Martinvt.com
---------------------------------
--
This is the Open discussion among iSeries Users (CPF0000) mailing list
To post a message email: CPF0000@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cpf0000
or email: CPF0000-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/cpf0000.
