I can not find where it is against the law for males of 17 & older to
have consensual sex in Massachusetts or D.C., where I understood the
acts to have taken place? I posted the link showing that.
Again, Chuck, why do you believe it was against the law?
"MASSACHUSETTS 16
*If a minor 16 or 17 years of age is a virgin, sex is illegal (Chapter 272:
Section 4. Inducing person under 18 to have sexual intercourse).*
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 16
Chuck Lewis wrote:
You just keep going round and round Booth. How do I know whey they didn't
prosecute them back then ? The fact is, and it hasn't changed; it was
against the law.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: cpf0000-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpf0000-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Booth Martin
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:37 PM
To: Open discussion among iSeries Users
Subject: Re: [CPF0000] Ah yes, those classy Democrats...
"It" being Wikipedia which we know is not aways perfectly right? Why
do you say that now, 30 years later, a law was broken, yet at that time
and that place no one was arrested (Republican or Democrat) nor even
given a charge for a misdemeanor?
