Re: Activation Group Selection -- COBOL400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Activation Group Selection
From: Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:13:52 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/cobol400-l>
List-help: <mailto:cobol400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: COBOL Programming on the iSeries/AS400 <cobol400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:cobol400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cobol400-l>, <mailto:cobol400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cobol400-l>, <mailto:cobol400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Too bad. It's a nice feature. Thanks, Jon.

Joe

Nope.

It was supposed to be added. But it doesn't ever seem to have happened. Which is rather funny in a way because the idea of imbedding compiler directives on RPG's H-spec came from COBOL's PROCESS statement!

Jon Paris

On Feb 20, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Joe Pluta wrote:

In ILE RPG, I can define the activation group for my program in the
H-Spec using DFTACTGRP(*NO) and ACTGRP(xxx). That way I don't have to
do it in my compile command. Is there a corresponding technique in ILE
COBOL?

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.