× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



> If in fact the compiler can choose to clear fields outside of documented
> means (and again, if this is documented, then show me where and I'll be
> less disgruntled).... what reliability do we have in any area, including
> WORKING-STORAGE?

The compiler doesn't clear anything.  The reason this happens is that the
compiler maps the record I/O area _directly_ into the buffer.  Therefore if
the system clears the buffer or (more likely in the case of blocked I/O)
simply moves the buffer pointer, the previous data will no longer be
"visible".  This has always been the case in COBOL (ILE, OPM, S/36, S/370,
Un*x, etc.) and in fact is effectively documented in ANSI - words to the
effect that the content of the buffer after the output operation (actually
after a failed input too) "is undefined".  No matter what platform, you
should _never_ rely on the buffer content in COBOL after any write
operation, no matter what the platform.

As to WORKING-STORAGE the behavior is clearly defined (cleared only when you
say so) and you need have no fear.

Jon Paris
Partner400



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.