|
Thank you. I got this to work. It makes perfect sense. In the program where I am doing this, I am only dealing with alpha fields in the parameter list. You imply that there are some special considerations for passing numeric fields. Could you explain this further? I'm guessing it's a signed vs. packed issue, but more specifics would be appreciated. TIA, Dan --- Finucci Domenico <Domenico.Finucci@Fiditalia.it> wrote: > Hello. > ==========> I assume that the USING phrase allows multiple fields. > True or > False? > True > ==========> I don't know if there are special rules in the case of a > Cobol > program calling an RPG > No special rules. Non ile pgm must handle the same number of > parameters, > that's all. > Your parameters are all char, even easier. > Sincerely > Domenico Finucci > Fiditalia, Milano __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
