× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



From: Leif Svalgaard <leif@leif.org>
To: <cobol400-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: Internal handling of numeric data in Cobol


> From: Greg Spohr <GSpohr@DOTFOODS.com>
>
>
> > I have recently been told that    "COBOL programs run more
> > efficiently when numeric fields are defined as odd length
>
> this is correct. You can make a simple test yourself.
> Add up a billion numbers (or 10 million or whatever).
> First try with pic s9(6) comp, then with s9(4) comp.  <== s9(5) comp
> Tell us the result.
>

too fat-fingered here, should be 5 digits.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.