Re: RPG IV versus COBOL - field naming

-----Original Message-----
From: geir.kildal@entragroup.com <geir.kildal@entragroup.com>
To: COBOL400-L@midrange.com <COBOL400-L@midrange.com>
Date: Friday, March 23, 2001 6:45 AM
Subject: RPG IV versus COBOL - field naming


>Hello.
>
>In earlier RPG, this was not possible.  We had to have a unique name on
>every field.
>

Not true. Renaming was possible in RPG III. See the I spec.

>My question is:  Has this canged in RPG IV?  Or do we still have to give
>each field a unique name?
>


Technically, yes, in RPG they all have to be unique, but only in the
program. Externally they can still be the same names between files. The
Prefix option in RPG IV will alter the names in the file's format, much the
same as the Replacing clause of the Copy statement in COBOL. And I believe
the renaming option for a field is still available, although I have not used
it for a long time now.


===========================================================
R. Bruce Hoffman, Jr.
 -- IBM Certified Specialist - AS/400 Administrator
 -- IBM Certified Specialist - RPG IV Developer

"America is the land that fought for freedom and then
  began passing laws to get rid of it."

     - Alfred E. Neuman



+---
| This is the COBOL/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to COBOL400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to COBOL400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to COBOL400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---END