RE: BPCS 604 x V5R2 OS/400 -- BPCS-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Yes.  Read the attached bulletin.  If you already applied 14837
permanently, then you can not remove it.

We are going to apply PTF/FIX # MF34800.  We just received it.  We did
not experience the high CPU% as some of IBM's other users, but we did
note that logicals with select/omits were affected.  In some cases,
creating an index (identical to the logical) helped.

We also noted performance issues in pick release and order entry.

We are MM 6.1.02, 9/03 BMR bundle applied.


Mark


-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+richarma=hartcool.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+richarma=hartcool.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
rkonda
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 4:23 PM
To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [BPCS-L] BPCS 604 x V5R2 OS/400

Hi Everybody, 

We'd changed the OS/400 version from v5r1 to v5r2 and after that our
BPCS programs had a performance problem in several applications. 

We are in BPCS 6004 MM. 

Did anybody have the same problem ? 

We already saw the IBM APAR, PTF SI14837 apllied, and DB PTF is in 17
level. 

Thanks in advance. 

Renato

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.