Re: Cost Roll Up and Item Type

welcome to bpcs costing!

you're going to have to do something to the bill structure. we also
have this problem where costs get duplicated. and it works in reverse,
if you change a buy part to make in house you can also double the costs.


you might change the bill structure to an a different method code that
is not recognized by the cost roll up. or can you go through the bill
and make change the out effectivity date so that all components are not
longer active?



>>> JINGKER_CHENG@xxxxxxxxxxxx 08/01/03 03:10AM >>>
Dear ALL:

Using BPCS C/S 6.1.01 on HP-UX

With a BOM structure, AAF (Finish goods), AAM (Assembly),
Which AAM with two components AAC and AAR.

The BOM structure is AAF ---> AAM ---> AAC & AAR

When running cost roll up (CST500) (actual cost or standard cost),
the previous level cost of AAM will be the sum of AAC and AAR.
Of course, that will be OK if AAM is an assembly.

If we outsourcing the AAM, it means the item type changed to
"Purchase",and
if
we maintain the price into this level cost, the cost roll up result of
AAF
is
no longer correct !  The cost roll up will summary the this level and
previous
level cost. But it is not the real case !

Is there any solution to "bypass" the price calculation of AAC and AAR
if
AAM
is a purchasing item (I do not want to change the BOM structure).

Thanks

Jingker Cheng


_______________________________________________
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l 
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.