× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Dear ALL:

Using BPCS C/S 6.1.01 on HP-UX

With a BOM structure, AAF (Finish goods), AAM (Assembly),
Which AAM with two components AAC and AAR.

The BOM structure is AAF ---> AAM ---> AAC & AAR

When running cost roll up (CST500) (actual cost or standard cost),
the previous level cost of AAM will be the sum of AAC and AAR.
Of course, that will be OK if AAM is an assembly.

If we outsourcing the AAM, it means the item type changed to "Purchase",and
if
we maintain the price into this level cost, the cost roll up result of AAF
is
no longer correct !  The cost roll up will summary the this level and
previous
level cost. But it is not the real case !

Is there any solution to "bypass" the price calculation of AAC and AAR if
AAM
is a purchasing item (I do not want to change the BOM structure).

Thanks

Jingker Cheng



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.