Re: INV900

> >  We are currently having problems with very long runtimes of the INV900
> > program during month-end.  I have heard there is a commonly implemented
> > modification to this program that sets aside the purging/sequencing of the
> > ITH until other times of the month.
> While I do not doubt that such an animal as a "commonly implemented
> modification" exists, delaying purging and resequencing is certainly not
> going to speed the performance of INV900 in the long run.  Indeed, the sheer

We did indeed do this mod to save an enormous amount of time in the run of
INV900.  I believe we put it in way back in our V3.x days.  We are currently on
V405CD.  We run the purging program only when we need to recover some disk space
or we feel there is just "too much" data in the ITH (I don't think we've run it
for over a year now).

Our modification to the program was to comment out 4 statements in INV900:  The
Exsr $ITH, Exsr $ITH1, and the Move *Zeros ITSEQ statements before each of these
Exsr's.

Bill


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---