RE: RGZPFM & RCLSTG -- BPCS-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

I can't speak for the rclstg, but RGZPFM is one of my regular maintenance tasks. Depending on the version, the files'll be different, but on V4.05CD one of the chief offenders (for instance) is GJW. Tons of stuff gets fed in there, then sucked out by the G/L journal-entry generation programs, leaving hugemongous holes in the file. A DSPFD on it will typically show 700 records, with 35,000 deleted!

If you're running CST close or shop-order close, the FSO file, FOD file. ITH! If your system is purging records this is a good one. There's others, too...I've found 'em mostly by curiousity. BBH, BBL, um, ESN, ESR.....

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of oludare
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 11:50 AM
To: AS/400 Midrange Usergroup; Beepics BPCS Usergroup
Subject: RGZPFM & RCLSTG

Guys,

What are the Pros and Cons of performing RGZPFM & RCLSTG monthly.

For BPCS: Are there any pitfalls performing RGZPFM ?

Oludare

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.