× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: User groups in decline? only if you dont get involved
  • From: "Graziano, Marie" <mgraziano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 07:52:50 -0500


Charles- 

 People need to get involved.  Not say they are going to do it BUT DO IT.
As far as WBUG, I have received feedback from some of the companies that
were sent the application form that they do want the group to continue.  

One reason for the decline that everyone is seeing is that these meetings
are held off hours.  This means people have to give up their personal time
(which is very expensive these days).  Seminars are held during the day
which they already give up for their job.

I will say it over and over.  You will get out what you put in.  


 -----Original Message-----
From:   Barnard, Charles [mailto:cbarnard@nicoletbiomedical.com] 
Sent:   Wednesday, October 04, 2000 2:52 PM
To:     'BPCS-L@midrange.com'
Subject:        User groups in decline?

<slightly off topic>
I've recently become aware through discussion within the Wisconsin BPCS
Users Group and the Minnesota Midrange Users Group that there seems to be a
radical decline in attendance to UG functions in general, and I am VERY
interested in trying to reverse this trend.

Now, part of the problem (in the WBUG, anyway) seems to be that very few
USERS are actually involved in the group, the majority of the attendees at
meetings seem to be a) Vendor reps, b) consulting company reps, c) MIS types
from companies running BPCS. Actual users seem to be an extinct species.

The take I got from the MMUG people is that while they have 150+ corporate
members, only about 30-50 people routinely show for a meeting (the Sept.
meeting I attended had 3, including me - which is probably an anomaly.)  But
these same 150+ companies send people routinely to pay-for seminars @
$500+/head.  And the only way they are getting any attendance increases at
meetings is to bring in high-profile speakers.

Two questions:

1) Anyone else seeing this sort of trend?
2) Anyone got any ideas about how to reverse it?

Charles Barnard
Nicolet Biomedical
608-441-2347

+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.