RE: About BPCS V6.1.01 MM - related question

My other plant is currently implementing pretty-much-modified V6.1.01MM.
When you said 'depending on how much of the code they modified' what did you
mean?  The vanilla version worked better or worse?

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of DAsmussen@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 3:48 AM
To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
Subject: Re: About BPCS V6.1.01 MM


Jorge,

In a message dated 9/19/00 7:20:56 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
jtorres@cosapisoft.com.pe writes:

> Is someone using BPCS V6.1.01 or V6.1.00 Mixed Mode? Can you talk about
>  your experience on it?. The company I work for is planning to upgrade
from
>  V6.0.02 MM. We are not prepared to go to full C/S because of too many
dumb
>  terminals in use.

I've implemented V6.1.01MM at several clients, to varying degrees of success
based upon how much code the client had modified.  The experience has varied
further depending upon what version they were converting _FROM_.  What's
_your_ situation?

Regards,

Dean Asmussen
Enterprise Systems Consulting, Inc.
Fuquay-Varina, NC  USA
E-mail:  DAsmussen@aol.com

"Anyone who is not liberal in their youth has no heart.  Anyone who is not
conservative in their adulthood has no brain." -- Winston Churchill
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---

+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---