Re: CMF again -- BPCS-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Per a previous response to other problems with CMF, the difference between the
total of cost buckets vs cost bucket 0 could be low level code problems on the
B/M.  There have been BMRs in v6.04 and v6.1 to address these problems.  Without
the BMR corrections, run BOM low level code re-set prior to CST600.

Copying costs from one cost set to another is an interesting workaround.
Whenever you copy costs from one set to another, I recommend using CST920 to
clear the "target" cost set prior to doing the copy.  I am not aware of any
"gotchas" using CST920 clear function vs going outside of BPCS with SQL.

Peggy Heritz, Executive
Crowe Chizek & Company, LLP
http://www.crowechizek.com/scg/
219.236.8698


+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.