|
> Date: Monday, October 12, 1998 10:42 AM > > We are in the process of forming a BPCS UNIX User Group. Interested? Definately interested. We are running 6.02 full client server currently and moving towards 6.04 as soon as possible. We currently run CEA, A/P, A/R, Purchasing, Inventory, Materials, MPS, BOM's and ECO. Melissa Urban Business System Process Manager Schukra of North America phone (519) 254-4410 ext 230 fax (519) 254-6884 ---------- > From: JALiberty@lozier.com > To: BPCS-L@midrange.com > Subject: RE: Overall BPCS performance > Date: Monday, October 12, 1998 10:42 AM > > We are in the process of forming a BPCS UNIX User Group. Interested? > > > ---------- > > From: Hancock, Teri[SMTP:THANCOCK@accuridecorp.com] > > Reply To: BPCS-L@midrange.com > > Sent: Thursday, October 08, 1998 4:36 PM > > To: 'BPCS-L@midrange.com' > > Subject: RE: Overall BPCS performance > > > > Where might one find a BPCS User Group? I'm very interested > > > > Teri Hancock > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Graziano, Marie [SMTP:mgraziano@badgermeter.com] > > Sent: Thursday, October 08, 1998 7:13 AM > > To: 'BPCS-L@midrange.com' > > Subject: RE: Overall BPCS performance > > > > Vince: > > > > Yes this is an issue with many many BPCS 6.x users. I will tell you > > that if > > you do a prtsqlinf over the program you will see that the sql > > statements are > > many and complex. It will also tell you if it had to build paths. > > If it > > did, then create a logical for the criteria. > > Per BPCS SSA saying no one has this problem is nuts. They are aware > > of the > > slowwwwwwness. If you belong to a local BPCS users group use that > > avenue to > > get SSA to respond. > > > > BYW- are you mixed mode?? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vince Rowe [mailto:vrowe@zeus.odyssey.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 1998 7:02 PM > > To: BPCS-L@midrange.com > > Subject: Re: Overall BPCS performance > > > > At 07:41 PM 10/7/98 -0400, you wrote: > > >Has anyone addressed their overall system > > performance > > decline since going to > > >BPCS 6.x. When we talk with them they try to > > indicated > > that we are the only > > >one addressing these types of problems. (Which I > > know is > > not true). > > > > > Here's our sad tale: 2+ years ago we started to > > implement > > BPCS 5.x.x on a > > nice little 310 AS/400. Of course we had to move to > > 6.x.x, > > and over the > > years we've landed on 6.0.2 PLF mixed mode March > > Cum. Over > > a year ago we > > actually got COM to function and discovered to our > > dismay > > that a one line > > order took 20 minutes to confirm with no one else on > > the > > box. Well, the > > cure was a 510 w/ 728M of memory and 60G of DASD. > > We're > > supposed to go > > live in 3 weeks and decided to do a stress test w/ > > 10 CS > > people or so doing > > order entry at 3 sites and a few others (trying) to > > do > > various tasks that > > would ordinarily be required to run a business. > > Back to the > > 20 minute > > scenerio w/ COM timing out on two out of three > > tries; simple > > GreenScreen > > Material Status lookups took minutes; forget getting > > anything to print; and > > the box was pegged for an hour *after* we completed > > our 1 > > hour test, > > finishing up some 65 left over jobs..........When we > > got the > > 510, it was > > the biggest box IBM made. My question is: can IBM > > make a > > machine that is > > up to the punishment BPCS hands out? Yes, we've had > > tuning > > specialist here > > and our BPCS consultants have remarked that our > > machine is > > the fastest > > responding they've ever used. > > > > You are not alone. > > > > Vince Rowe > > vrowe@odyssey.net > > Marietta Corporation > > Cortland, NY > > +--- > > | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! > > | To submit a new message, send your mail to > > BPCS-L@midrange.com. > > | To subscribe to this list send email to > > BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. > > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to > > BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > > | Questions should be directed to the list owner: > > dasmussen@aol.com > > +--- > > +--- > > | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! > > | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. > > | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. > > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to > > BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > > | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com > > +--- > > +--- > > | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! > > | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. > > | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. > > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > > | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com > > +--- > > > +--- > | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. > | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com > +--- +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
